How does BrainYears™ compare to resting-state neural imaging devices used in clinics?

Modified on Wed, 22 Apr at 7:33 PM

Some clinical neural measurement devices use advanced sensing technologies — such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) or other optical methods — to measure brain activity. These are significant investments ($28,000–$100,000+/year) and capture real neural data. Some, including fNIRS-based systems, can be deployed during cognitive tasks — not just at rest.

However, fNIRS measures blood oxygenation changes at a sampling rate of 5–10 Hz, which is too slow to capture event-related potentials and the pre-conscious neural processes that unfold in under 500 milliseconds. BrainYears™ captures at 1,000 Hz with millisecond-level temporal resolution — precise enough to resolve event-related potentials and the neural processes that unfold in under 500 milliseconds.

This is what makes it possible to extract 643 validated biomarkers from a 15-minute task-based protocol, achieving published accuracy of MAE 4.4 years from a portable wearable device, at a fraction of the cost of these systems, with integrated neurofeedback and photobiomodulation capability.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article